An unfortunate event tonight brought to mind a blog I had made earlier in the week. I'll spare you the entire thing, but I will bring up the main points.
If someone calls you fat (with malicious intent), and you punch them in the face, I don't think either person has done any worse. Hell, in medieval Scotland if someone insulted your honour, and you put a sword through their chest, nobody would hold it against you. In fact, you would probably be applauded.
So why is it these days that when someone calls you fat (this being an example), your consequence-free choices are limited to 1. ignore them 2. call them retarded (another example)?
Either form is an
assault on the person, and responding with force may just be the only reciprocation the audacious individual would understand to mean that they shouldn't fuck with you.
Everybody deserves a fundamental level of respect. Only if someone earns it should they get more, but NOBODY has to earn the respect they should have by right of being an individual.
In my books, a remark that unintentionally offends should be let go of, but one that is intended should - by all rights, be met with appropriate force. I believe that if someone intentionally punches you (to hurt you), you should punch them back twice. Once for assaulting your person, and once to drill it home that what they did was wrong.
Personally, I don't get upset over words, but I do get offended. And sometimes a punch is more appropriate than a quip.
Anyways, opinions?