Quote:
Originally Posted by rightwinger
And people who try and make the argument that the second amendment guarantees the right to a "well regulated militia" those people are retards. It specifically says "PEOPLE". Probably meant to protect themselves from that well regulated militia mentioned earlier in the amendment.
|
You should watch on the news the anti gun politicans freaking out such as Fienstien to name one(who in 1995 said she would use the national guard to disarm everyone in the US, dispite having a gun with a CCW). This ruling should help the open carry movement ( opencarry.org ) pick up more popularity since CCW appear to not be protected. If you lived in CA, you would be pissed since the police, government, alot of people in CA and the politicans strongly believe in total gun bans. For people like me, there appears to be hope and i would like to be able to put a pistol grip, buy high capacity mags on my CA legal semi auto, magazine fed AK(also called a RAA Saiga) that i was able to get legally because of how poorly the CA laws are written.
__________________
nra.org
calguns.net
cheaperthandirt.com
The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government. Thomas Jefferson
"911 could have been prevented if we had more respect for the second amendment"-Ron Paul
Warren vs. DC
Castle Rock v. Gonzales
DeShaney v. Winnebago County
These US Supreme Court cases ruled it is not the police department's job to protect you