Quote:
|
im unsure where to even begin to see a list of materials used for a demolition
|
This is what people would call "doing research"
If I were to make a claim, that 9-11 was a controlled demolition. I'd have done some research, into what a controlled demolition is. Probably would have fired a few e-mails to some demolition firms. Made some calls etc.
But your goal isn't research. Hence, why all your info comes from conspiracy sites.
There is no evidence of controlled demolition. Furthermore, there is no evidence of thermite.
Steven Jones' evidence of thermite is dust samples of materials.....that are used in building construction. He found sulfur, and thinks that's indicative of thermite. But, the dry wall in the WTC buildings was sulfur based. That's the extent of the evidence for thermite. Nothing. The fact that it is not used in demolitions, and is also infeasible...is gravy, on top of the fact that there is no evidence of it's use in this case.
Nor is there any evidence of a controlled demolition.
Quote:
|
the accusation you gave was that thermite could not be used for demolition
|
I said that it is not used in demolition, and it's infeasible to do so.
Due to the amount needed.
It would be impossible to sneak that much thermite into a building, and secretly plant it with nobody noticing.
Quote:
|
You seem to act as though there is never a first time for anything, that if its not fully documented, and explained, used in the past with diagrams, testimony from Bush and probably used in your hometown, that it is impossible
|
If there is no evidence for something...I do not believe it.
It's a patent for a product, that is not in production, and is not in use.
Quote:
|
information proving that its possible etc
|
Proving that it's possible is not even the issue.
You have to prove, that it WAS used. Not that it could be used.
Quote:
|
but truthfully you dont seem to believe anything is even possible without a documentary by some magicians like penn and teller, or a article in popular mechanics magazine
|
I don't rely on Penn and Teller or Popular Mechanics.
I take what NIST and the ASCE say about structures seriously though. And I take peer reviewed science seriously. (No. Not an open letter published in a vanity journal....for which Steven Jones had to PAY, and the people who actually reviewed it are not identified)
I go where the evidence points me. And there is no evidence for your theories. On top of them being completely fucking insane, and lacking evidence of any kind.