|
There is something i also fear, yes i am bring up guns again. In Washington, there is a bill being voted on that will take away the 4 and 5 amendment (right to trail, search ect.) rights of any gun owner in the state. These are lawbiding citizens who legally bought their guns w/ a background check. CA is enacting a lot of laws and Hillary/Obama support a ban on all guns. In the debate they call for banning almost all guns but their voting record shows they have backed backdoor gun bans. Not to mention they are against self defense as their voting record shows. The government study groups along with independent long term studys shows that not one gun law has prevented crime and more guns in lawbiding citizens hand reduces crime. So if they are trying to pass more laws that does not stop crime and only effect people who are not criminals, then their intentions are not good. Their interest are to disarm citizens and distory individual rights for the "public good".
If the anti gun politicans do succeed in their plans, we can very well except resistant groups, revolutions from people like me. Ron Paul in todays conference brought the subject up that the right to bear arms is a right for citizens to defend themselves. I can't give up my rights because i fear local criminals will attack since the cops are not there to protect individuals. The only thing stopping them is because we have a bullet with their name on it...well more like 2,000 of them.
__________________
nra.org
calguns.net
cheaperthandirt.com
The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government. Thomas Jefferson
"911 could have been prevented if we had more respect for the second amendment"-Ron Paul
Warren vs. DC
Castle Rock v. Gonzales
DeShaney v. Winnebago County
These US Supreme Court cases ruled it is not the police department's job to protect you
|